发布网友 发布时间:2022-04-21 01:06
共4个回答
热心网友 时间:2022-06-17 00:15
The author thinks, to limit compensation in our civil law is not clear, the legitimacy of the provisions in the law solely for basis from that contradictions, easily. From the perspective of law and economics, the rationality of the limit compensation problem can reach more rational to be the answer.
热心网友 时间:2022-06-17 00:16
the author considers the legal regulations unclarified of the limited compensation in China's Civil Law, thus it is not difficult to spot the contradictory arguments by finding only the ground in the Clause. it would be suprisingly reasonable to find an answer to the rationality issure of the limited compensation if we see to it from the perspective of the economics of law.
热心网友 时间:2022-06-17 00:16
The author holds that the civil law of China fails to provide a clear definition of the leagality of limited compensation and therefore drawing on legal clauses tend to generate contradictory views, and that more rational answers are to be attained by studying the leagality of limited compensation in the perspective of Legal Economics.
热心网友 时间:2022-06-17 00:17
这句话是?